Paper detail

Split invariance principles for stationary processes

The results of Komlós, Major and Tusnády give optimal Wiener approximation of partial sums of i.i.d. random variables and provide an extremely powerful tool in probability and statistical inference. Recently Wu [Ann. Probab. 35 (2007) 2294--2320] obtained Wiener approximation of a class of dependent stationary processes with finite $p$th moments, $2<p\le4$, with error term $o(n^{1/p}(\log n)^γ)$, $γ>0$, and Liu and Lin [Stochastic Process. Appl. 119 (2009) 249--280] removed the logarithmic factor, reaching the Komlós--Major--Tusnády bound $o(n^{1/p})$. No similar results exist for $p>4$, and in fact, no existing method for dependent approximation yields an a.s. rate better than $o(n^{1/4})$. In this paper we show that allowing a second Wiener component in the approximation, we can get rates near to $o(n^{1/p})$ for arbitrary $p>2$. This extends the scope of applications of the results essentially, as we illustrate it by proving new limit theorems for increments of stochastic processes and statistical tests for short term (epidemic) changes in stationary processes. Our method works under a general weak dependence condition covering wide classes of linear and nonlinear time series models and classical dynamical systems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.