Paper detail

Split form ALE discontinuous Galerkin methods with applications to under-resolved turbulent low-Mach number flows

The construction of discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods for the compressible Euler or Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) includes the approximation of non-linear flux terms in the volume integrals. The terms can lead to aliasing and stability issues in turbulence simulations with moderate Mach numbers (Ma < 0.3), e.g. due to under-resolution of vortical dominated structures typical in large eddy simulations (LES). The kinetic energy or entropy are elevated in smooth, but under-resolved parts of the solution which are affected by aliasing. It is known that the kinetic energy is not a conserved quantity for compressible flows, but for small Mach numbers minor deviations from a conserved evolution can be expected. While it is formally possible to construct kinetic energy preserving (KEP) and entropy conserving (EC) DG methods for the Euler equations, due to the viscous terms in case of the NSE, we aim to construct kinetic energy dissipative (KED) or entropy stable (ES) DG methods on moving curved hexahedral meshes. The Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approach is used to include the effect of mesh motion in the split form DG methods. First, we use the three dimensional Taylor-Green vortex to investigate and analyze our theoretical findings and the behavior of the novel split form ALE DG schemes for a turbulent vortical dominated flow. Second, we apply the framework to a complex aerodynamics application. An implicit LES split form ALE DG approach is used to simulate the transitional flow around a plunging SD7003 airfoil at Reynolds number Re = 40, 000 and Mach number Ma = 0.1. We compare the standard nodal ALE DG scheme, the ALE DG variant with consistent overintegration of the non-linear terms and the novel KED and ES split form ALE DG methods in terms of robustness, accuracy and computational efficiency.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.