Paper detail

Spitzer spectral line mapping of protostellar outflows: II H2 emission in L1157

We present an analysis of Spitzer-IRS spectroscopic maps of the L1157 protostellar outflow in the H2 pure-rotational lines from S(0) to S(7). The aim of this work is to derive the physical conditions pertaining to the warm molecular gas and study their variations within the flow. The mid-IR H2 emission follows the morphology of the precessing flow, with peaks correlated with individual CO clumps and H2 2.12μm ro-vibrational emission. More diffuse emission delineating the CO cavities is detected only in the low-laying transitions, with J(lower) less or equal to 2. The H2 line images have been used to construct 2D maps of N(H2), H2 ortho-to-para ratio and temperature spectral index beta, in the assumption of a gas temperature stratification where the H2 column density varies as T^(beta). Variations of these parameters are observed along the flow. In particular, the ortho-to-para ratio ranges from 0.6 to 2.8, highlighting the presence of regions subject to recent shocks where the ortho-to-para ratio has not had time yet to reach the equilibrium value. Near-IR spectroscopic data on ro-vibrational H2 emission have been combined with the mid-IR data and used to derive additional shock parameters in the brightest blue- and red-shifted emission knots. A high abundance of atomic hydrogen (H/H2 about 0.1-0.3) is implied by the observed H2 column densities, assuming n(H2) values as derived by independent SiO observations. The presence of a high fraction of atomic hydrogen, indicates that a partially-dissociative shock component should be considered for the H2 excitation in these localized regions. However, planar shock models, either of C- or J-type, are not able to consistently reproduce all the physical parameters derived from our analysis of the H2 emission. Globally, H2 emission contributes to about 50% of the total shock radiated energy in the L1157 outflow.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.