Paper detail

Spitzer Observations of Molecular Hydrogen in Interacting Supernova Remnants

With Spitzer IRS we have obtained sensitive low-resolution spectroscopy from 5 to 35 microns for six supernova remnants (SNRs) that show evidence of shocked molecular gas: Kes 69, 3C 396, Kes 17, G346.6-0.2, G348.5-0.0 and G349.7+0.2. Bright, pure-rotational lines of molecular hydrogen are detected at the shock front in all remnants, indicative of radiative cooling from shocks interacting with dense clouds. We find the excitation of H2 S(0)-S(7) lines in these SNRs requires two non-dissociative shock components: a slow, 10 km/s C- shock through clumps of density 10^6 cm^-3, and a faster, 40-70 km/s C- shock through a medium of density 10^4 cm^-3. The ortho-to-para ratio for molecular hydrogen in the warm shocked gas is typically found to be much less than the LTE value, suggesting that these SNRs are propagating into cold quiescent clouds. Additionally a total of thirteen atomic fine-structure transitions of Ar+, Ar++, Fe+, Ne+, Ne++, S++, and Si+ are detected. The ionic emitting regions are spatially segregated from the molecular emitting regions within the IRS slits. The presence of ionic lines with high appearance potential requires the presence of much faster, dissociative shocks through a lower density medium. The IRS slits are sufficiently wide to include regions outside the SNR which permits emission from diffuse gas around the remnants to be separated from the shocked emission. We find the diffuse molecular hydrogen gas projected outside the SNR is excited to a temperature of 100 to 300 K with a warm gas fraction of 0.5 to 15 percent along the line of sight.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.