Paper detail

Spitzer Limits On Dust Emission and Optical Gas Absorption Variability Around Nearby Stars with Edge-On Circumstellar Disk Signatures

We present Spitzer observations and McDonald Observatory Smith Telescope and Anglo-Australian Telescope high spectral resolution optical observations of 4 nearby stars with variable or anomalous optical absorption, likely caused by circumstellar material. The optical observations of CaII and NaI cover a 2.8 year baseline, and extend the long term monitoring of these systems by previous researchers. In addition, mini-surveys of the local interstellar medium (LISM) around our primary targets provide a reconstruction of the intervening LISM along the line of sight. We confirm that the anomalous absorption detected toward alpha Oph is not due to circumstellar material, but to a small filamentary cloud <14.3 pc from the Sun. The three other primary targets, beta Car, HD85905, and HR10 show both short and long term variability, and little of the observed absorption can be attributed to the LISM along the line of sight. The Spitzer observations did not detect infrared excesses. We are able to place upper limits on any possible fractional infrared luminosity, which range from L_IR/L_star < 2-5 10^-6, for our three disk stars. No stable gas absorption component centered at the radial velocity of the star is detected for any of our targets. Based on simple assumptions of the variable gas absorption component, we estimate limits on the circumstellar gas mass causing the variable absorption, which range from 0.4-20 10^-8 M_Earth. These multiwavelength observations place strong limits on any possible circumstellar dust, while confirming variable circumstellar gas absorption, and therefore are interesting targets to explore the origins and evolution of variable circumstellar gas. (abridged)

preprint2007arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.