Paper detail

Spitzer/IRS investigation of MIPSGAL 24 microns compact bubbles

The MIPSGAL 24 $μ$m Galactic Plane Survey has revealed more than 400 compact-extended objects. Less than 15% of these MIPSGAL bubbles (MBs) are known and identified as evolved stars. We present Spitzer observations of 4 MBs obtained with the InfraRed Spectrograph to determine the origin of the mid-IR emission. We model the mid-IR gas lines and the dust emission to infer physical conditions within the MBs and consequently their nature. Two MBs show a dust-poor spectrum dominated by highly ionized gas lines of [\ion{O}{4}], [\ion{Ne}{3}], [\ion{Ne}{5}], [\ion{S}{3}] and [\ion{S}{4}]. We identify them as planetary nebulae with a density of a few 10$^3\ \rm{cm^{-3}}$ and a central white dwarf of $\gtrsim 200,000$ K. The mid-IR emission of the two other MBs is dominated by a dust continuum and lower-excitation lines. Both of them show a central source in the near-IR (2MASS and IRAC) broadband images. The first dust-rich MB matches a Wolf-Rayet star of $\sim 60,000$ K at 7.5 kpc with dust components of $\sim170$ and $\sim1750$ K. Its mass is about $10^{-3}\ \rm{M_\odot}$ and its mass loss is about $10^{-6}\ \rm{M_\odot/yr}$. The second dust-rich MB has recently been suggested as a Be/B[e]/LBV candidate. The gas lines of [\ion{Fe}{2}] as well as hot continuum components ($\sim300$ and $\sim1250$ K) arise from the inside of the MB while its outer shell emits a colder dust component ($\sim75$ K). The distance to the MB remains highly uncertain. Its mass is about $10^{-3}\ \rm{M_\odot}$ and its mass loss is about $10^{-5}\ \rm{M_\odot/yr}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.