Paper detail

Spitzer Characterization of Dust in the Ionized Medium of the Large Magellanic Cloud

A systematic investigation of dust emission associated with the ionized gas has so far been performed only in our Galaxy and for wavelengths longer than 60 μm. Newly available Spitzer data now offer the opportunity to carry out a similar analysis in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). By cross-correlating Spitzer SAGE (Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy's Evolution) data with the ATCA/Parkes HI 21-cm data, the NANTEN 12CO (J=1-0) data, and both the SHASSA Hα and the Parkes 6-cm data, we investigate the physical properties of dust associated with the different phases of the gas (atomic, molecular and ionized). In particular, we study the presence and nature of dust from 3.6 to 160 μm and for various regimes of the ionized gas, spanning emission measures (EM) from \sim 1 pc cm-6 (diffuse component) to \sim 10^3 pc cm-6 (HII regions). Using a dust emission model, and testing our results with several radiation field spectra, we show that dust in the ionized gas is warmer than dust associated with other phases (atomic and molecular). We also find a decrease of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) relative abundance with respect to big grains (BGs), as well as an increase of the near infrared (NIR) continuum. These three results (e.g. warmer temperature, decrease of PAH abundance and increase of the NIR continuum) are found consistently for all regimes of the ionized gas. On the contrary, the molecular phase appears to provide favorable conditions for the survival of PAHs. Furthermore, the very small grain (VSG) relative abundance tends to increase in the ionized phase, especially in bright HII regions. Last but not least, our analysis shows that the emissivity of dust associated with the ionized gas is lower in the LMC than in our Galaxy, and that this difference is not accounted for by the lower metallicity of the LMC.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.