Paper detail

Spitzer 70~$μ$m Emission as a SFR Indicator for Sub--Galactic Regions

We use Spitzer 24 $μ$m, 70 $μ$m and ground based H$α$ data for a sample of 40 SINGS galaxies to establish a star formation rate (SFR) indicator using 70 $μ$m emission for sub--galactic ($\sim0.05-2\ \rm{kpc}$) line-emitting regions and to investigate limits in application. A linear correlation between 70 $μ$m and SFR is found and a star formation indicator SFR(70) is proposed for line-emitting sub-galactic regions as $\rm Σ(SFR)\ ({M_{\odot}\cdot yr^{-1}\cdot kpc^{-2}})=9.4\times10^{-44}\ Σ(70)\ \rm{(ergs\cdot s^{-1}\cdot kpc^{-2})}$, for regions with $12+\rm{log(O/H)}\gtrsim8.4$ and $\rm Σ(SFR)\gtrsim10^{-3}\ (M_{\odot}\cdot yr^{-1}\cdot kpc^{-2})$, with a 1-$σ$ dispersion around the calibration of $\sim0.16$ dex. We also discuss the influence of metallicity on the scatter of the data. Comparing with the SFR indicator at 70 $μ$m for integrated light from galaxies, we find that there is $\sim40%$ excess 70 $μ$m emission in galaxies, which can be attributed to stellar populations not involved in the current star formation activity.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.