Paper detail

Spinodal Gap Dependence on Size and Boundary Reaction Rate for Intercalation in Nanoparticles

Using mathematical model for intercalation dynamics in phase-separating materials proposed in (Singh, G. K.; Ceder, G.; Bazant, M. Z. Electrochimica Acta 2008, 53, 7599) and developed further in (Burch, D.; Bazant, M. Z. Nano Letters 2009, 9, 3795) we found that the spinodal gap generally shrinks as the particle size decreases. We also got that for some range of boundary reaction rate parameter and particle size the concentration spinodal gap is not continuous but it has stable "islands" where no spinodal decomposition is expected. In fact the presence of infinitesimally small boundary reaction rate parameter will destabilize nano particle even for infinitesimal length of particle. But then further continuous raise of this parameter will stabilize the system till some limit. We made careful analysis to study the dependence of spinodal decomposition on boundary reaction rate and size parameters which can be used for LiFePO4 battery material application. Our model predicted that for nanoparticles having size less than diffusion length and enough small boundary reaction rate spontanious charge or discharge will occur.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.