Paper detail

Spinning test body orbiting around a Kerr black hole: Comparing Spin Supplementary Conditions for Circular Equatorial Orbits

The worldline of a spinning test body moving in curved spacetime can be provided by the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon (MPD) equations when its centroid, i.e. its center of mass, is fixed by a Spin Supplementary Condition (SSC). In the present study, we continue the exploration of shifts between different centroids started in a recently published work [ Phys. Rev. D 104, 024042 (2021)], henceforth Paper I, for the Schwarzschild spacetime, by examining the frequencies of circular equatorial orbits under a change of the SSC in the Kerr spacetime. In particular, we examine the convergence in the terms of the prograde and retrograde orbital frequencies, when these frequencies are expanded in power series of the spin measure and the centroid of the body is shifted from the Mathisson-Pirani or the Ohashi-Kyrian-Semerak frame to the Tulczyjew-Dixon one. Since in Paper I, we have seen that the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCOs) hold a special place in this comparison process, we focus on them rigorously in this work. We introduce a novel method of finding ISCOs for any SSC and employ it for the Tulczyjew-Dixon and the Mathisson-Pirani formalisms. We resort to numerical investigation of the convergence between the SSCs for the ISCO case, due to technical difficulties not allowing Paper's I analytical treatment. Our conclusion, as in Paper I, is that there appears to be a convergence in the power series of the frequencies between the SSCs, which is improved when the proper shifts are taken into account, but there exists a limit in this convergence due to the fact that in the spinning body approximation we consider only the first two lower multipoles of the extended body and ignore all the higher ones.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.