Paper detail

Spinning and color properties of the active asteroid (6478) Gault

We report on accurate $BVR_{c}$ observations of (6478) Gault, a 5-6 km diameter inner main-belt asteroid in the Phocaea family, notable for its sporadic, comet-like ejection of dust. This curious behavior has been mainly interpreted as reconfigurations after YORP spin-up, although merging of a contact binary system cannot be fully excluded. We collected optical observations along the 2019 March-April period, at orbital phase angles between $12^{\circ}-21^{\circ}$, to search for direct evidence of asteroid quick spinning rotation. A prevailing period value of $3.34 \pm 0.02$ hours is supported by our and other photometric observations. In the YORP spin-up hypothesis, this period points to a bulk density $ρ\approx 1$ $\textrm{g}/\textrm{cm}^3$. The mean colors are $B-V = +0.82_{\pm 0.3}$, $V-R_{c} = +0.28_{\pm 0.06}$ and $B-R_{c} = +1.11_{\pm 0.4}$, but we have observed a strong bluer color during the April session, with about $Δ(B-V) \sim 0.35 \pm 0.09$~mag. This color change can be due to asteroid rotation and support the hypothesis that there is a bluer surface under the Gault's dust, as indicated by spectroscopic observations made on 2019 March 31 and April 8 by Marsset et al. (2019).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.