Paper detail

Spin-parities of the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ in the One-Boson-Exchange Model

The LHCb collaboration has recently observed three pentaquark peaks, the $P_c(4312)$, $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$. They are very close to a pair of heavy baryon-meson thresholds, with the $P_c(4312)$ located $8.9\,{\rm MeV}$ below the $\bar{D} Σ_c$ threshold, and the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ located $21.8$ and $4.8\,{\rm MeV}$ below the $\bar{D}^* Σ_c$ one. The spin-parities of these three states have not been measured yet. In this work we assume that the $P_c(4312)$ is a $J^P = \tfrac{1}{2}^{-}$ $\bar{D} Σ_c$ bound state, while the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ are $\bar{D}^* Σ_c$ bound states of unknown spin-parity, where we notice that the consistent description of the three pentaquarks in the one-boson-exchange model can indeed determine the spin and parities of the later, i.e. of the two $\bar{D}^* Σ_c$ molecular candidates. For this determination we revisit first the one-boson-exchange model, which in its original formulation contains a short-range delta-like contribution in the spin-spin component of the potential. We argue that it is better to remove these delta-like contributions because, in this way, the one-boson-exchange potential will comply with the naive expectation that the form factors should not have a significant impact in the long-range part of the potential (in particular the one-pion-exchange part). Once this is done, we find that it is possible to consistently describe the three pentaquarks, to the point that the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ can be predicted from the $P_c(4312)$ within a couple of MeV with respect to their experimental location. In addition the so-constructed one-boson-exchange model predicts the preferred quantum numbers of the $P_c(4440)$ and $P_c(4457)$ molecular pentaquarks to be $\tfrac{3}{2}^-$ and $\tfrac{1}{2}^-$, respectively.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.