Paper detail

Spin-Orbit Angles of Kepler-13Ab and HAT-P-7b from Gravity-Darkened Transit Light Curves

Analysis of the transit light curve deformed by the stellar gravity darkening allows us to photometrically measure both components of the spin-orbit angle $ψ$, its sky projection $λ$ and inclination of the stellar spin axis $i_\star$. In this paper, we apply the method to two transiting hot Jupiter systems monitored with the Kepler spacecraft, Kepler-13A and HAT-P-7. For Kepler-13A, we find $i_\star=81^\circ\pm5^\circ$ and $ψ=60^\circ\pm2^\circ$ adopting the spectroscopic constraint $λ=58.6^\circ\pm2.0^\circ$ by Johnson et al. (2014). In our solution, the discrepancy between the above $λ$ and that previously reported by Barnes et al. (2011) is solved by fitting both of the two parameters in the quadratic limb-darkening law. We also report the temporal variation in the orbital inclination of Kepler-13Ab, $\mathrm{d} |\cos i_{\rm orb}|/\mathrm{d}t=(-7.0\pm0.4)\times10^{-6}\,\mathrm{day}^{-1}$, providing further evidence for the spin-orbit precession in this system. By fitting the precession model to the time series of $i_{\rm orb}$, $λ$, and $i_\star$ obtained with the gravity-darkened model, we constrain the stellar quadrupole moment $J_2=(6.1\pm0.3)\times10^{-5}$ for our new solution, which is several times smaller than $J_2=(1.66\pm0.08)\times10^{-4}$ obtained for the previous one. We show that the difference can be observable in the future evolution of $λ$, thus providing a possibility to test our solution with follow-up observations. The second target, HAT-P-7, is the first F-dwarf star analyzed with the gravity-darkening method. Our analysis points to a nearly pole-on configuration with $ψ=101^\circ\pm2^\circ$ or $87^\circ\pm2^\circ$ and the gravity-darkening exponent $β$ consistent with $0.25$. Such an observational constraint on $β$ can be useful for testing the theory of gravity darkening.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.