Paper detail

Spin down of superfluid-filled vessels: theory versus experiment

The spin up of helium II is studied by calculating the spin-down recovery of a superfluid-filled container after an impulsive acceleration and comparing with experiments. The calculation takes advantage of a recently published analytic solution for the spin up of a Hall-Vinen-Bekharevich-Khalatnikov superfluid that treats the back-reaction torque exerted by the viscous component self-consistently in arbitrary geometry for the first time. Excellent agreement at the 0.5% level is obtained for experiments at $T=1.57\,{\rm K}$, after correcting for the non-uniform rotation in the initial state, confirming that vortex tension and pinning (which are omitted from the theory) play a minimal role under certain conditions (small Rossby number, smooth walls). The dependence of the spin-down time on temperature and the mass fraction of the viscous component are also investigated. Closer to the lambda point, the predicted onset of turbulence invalidates the linear Ekman theory.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.