Paper detail

Spin Axes and Shape Models of Asteroid Pairs: Fingerprints of YORP and a Path to the Density of Rubble Piles

An asteroid pair consists of two unbound objects with almost identical heliocentric orbital elements that were formed when a single "rubble pile" asteroid failed to remain bound against an increasing rotation rate. Models suggest that the pairs' progenitors gained the fast rotation due to the YORP effect. Since it was shown that the spin axis vector can be aligned by the YORP effect, such a behavior should be seen on asteroid pairs, if they were indeed formed by the described mechanism. Alternatively, if the pairs were formed by a collision, the spin axes should have a random direction and small or young bodies might have a tumbling rotation. Here I apply the lightcurve inversion method on self-obtained photometric data, in order to derive the rotation axis vectors and shape models of the asteroid pairs 2110, 3749, 5026, 6070, 7343 and 44612. Three asteroids resulted with polar-directed spin axes and three objects with ambiguous results. In addition, the secondary member 44612 presents the same sense of rotation as its primary member 2110, and its spin is not tumbling. Finally, I use a rotational fission model, based on the assumption of an angular momentum conservation, and match it to the measured spin, shape, and mass ratio parameters in order to constrain the density of the primary members in the pairs. Using this method, low density values that are expected from a "rubble pile" are derived. All these results lead to the conclusion that the disruption of these asteroid pairs was most likely the outcome of the YORP effect that spun-up "rubble pile" asteroids.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.