Paper detail

Spin 1 condensates at thermal equilibrium : a $SU(3)$ coherent state approach

We propose a theoretical framework based on $SU(3)$ coherent states as a convenient tool to describe the collective state of a Bose-Einstein condensate of spin 1 atoms at thermal equilibrium. We work within the single-mode approximation, which assumes that all atoms condense in the same spatial mode. In this system, the magnetization $m_z$ is conserved to a very good approximation. This conservation law is included by introducing a prior distribution for $m_z$ and constructing a generalized statistical ensemble that preserves its first moments. In the limit of large particle numbers, we construct the partition function at thermal equilibrium and use it to compute various quantities of experimental interest, such as the probability distribution function and moments of the population in each Zeeman state. When $N$ is large but finite (as in typical experiments, where $N\sim 10^3-10^5$), we find that fluctuations of the collective spin can be important.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.