Paper detail

Spherically symmetric black holes in $f(R)$ gravity: Is geometric scalar hair supported ?

We discuss with a rather critical eye the current situation of black hole (BH) solutions in $f(R)$ gravity and shed light about its geometrical and physical significance. We also argue about the meaning, existence or lack thereof of a Birkhoff's theorem in this kind of modified gravity. We focus then on the analysis and quest of $non-trivial$ (i.e. hairy) $asymptotically\,\,flat$ (AF) BH solutions in static and spherically symmetric (SSS) spacetimes in vacuum having the property that the Ricci scalar does $not$ vanish identically in the domain of outer communication. To do so, we provide and enforce the $regularity\,\,conditions$ at the horizon in order to prevent the presence of singular solutions there. Specifically, we consider several classes of $f(R)$ models like those proposed recently for explaining the accelerated expansion in the universe and which have been thoroughly tested in several physical scenarios. Finally, we report analytical and numerical evidence about the $absence$ of $geometric\,\,hair$ in AFSSSBH solutions in those $f(R)$ models. First, we submit the models to the available no-hair theorems, and in the cases where the theorems apply, the absence of hair is demonstrated analytically. In the cases where the theorems do not apply, we resort to a numerical analysis due to the complexity of the non-linear differential equations. Within that aim, a code to solve the equations numerically was built and tested using well know exact solutions. In a future investigation we plan to analyze the problem of hair in De Sitter and Anti-De Sitter backgrounds.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.