Paper detail

Spherical Relationalism

This paper considers passing from the usual $\mathbb{R}^d$ model of absolute space to $\mathbb{S}^d$ at the level of relational particle models. Both approaches' $d = 1$ cases are rather simpler than their $d \geq 2$ cases, with $N$ particles in $\mathbb{S}^1$ admitting a straightforward reduction with shape space $\mathbb{T}^{N - 1}$. The $\mathbb{S}^2$ and $\mathbb{S}^3$ cases - observed skies and the simplest closed GR cosmologies respectively -- are also considered, the latter in the contexts of both static and dynamical radius of the model universe. The space of relational triangles on $\mathbb{S}^2$ is hyperbolic 3-space $\mathbb{H}^3$. Overall, by passing to a closed underlying absolute space, and then to dynamical notion of space, we close some of the modelling gaps between relational particle models and geometrodynamics or its inhomogeneous perturbative regime of interest in cosmology. Quantum counterparts are also outlined, for use as model arenas of quantum cosmology. These models are useful in further considerations of both classical and quantum background independence.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.