Paper detail

Sphalerons, knots, and dynamical compactification in Yang-Mills-Chern-Simon theories

Euclidean d=3 SU(2) Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons (YMCS) theory, including Georgi-Glashow (GGCS) theory, may have solitons in the presence of appropriate mass terms. For integral CS level k and for solitons carrying integral CS number, YMCS is gauge-invariant and consistent. However, individual solitons such as sphalerons and linked center vortices with CS number of 1/2 and writhing center vortices with arbitrary CS number are non-compact; a condensate of them threatens compactness of the theory. We study various forms of the non-compact theory in the dilute-gas approximation, treating the parameters of non-compact large gauge transformations as collective coordinates. We conclude: 1) YMCS theory dynamically compactifies; non-compact YMCS have infinitely higher vacuum energy than compact YMCS. 2) An odd number of sphalerons is associated with a domain- wall sphaleron, a pure-gauge configuration on a closed surface enclosing them and with a half-integral CS number. 3) We interpret the domain-wall sphaleron in terms of fictitious closed Abelian magnetic field lines that express the links of the Hopf fibration. Sphalerons are over- and under-crossings of knots in the field lines; the domain-wall sphaleron is a superconducting wall confining these knots to a compact domain. 4) Analogous results hold for center vortices and nexuses. 5) For a CS term induced with an odd number of fermion doublets, domain-wall sphalerons are related to non-normalizable fermion modes. 6) GGCS with monopoles is compactified with center-vortex-like strings.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.