Paper detail

Spelling Out Leptonic CP Violation in the Language of Invariant Theory

In terms of flavor invariants, we establish the intimate connection between leptonic CP violation in the canonical seesaw model for neutrino masses and that in the seesaw effective field theory (SEFT). For the first time, we calculate the Hilbert series and explicitly construct the primary flavor invariants in the SEFT by considering both the dimension-five Weinberg operator ${\cal O}^{αβ}_5 = \overline{\ell^{}_{α\rm L}} \widetilde{H} \widetilde{H}^{\rm T} \ell^{\rm C}_{β\rm L}$ and the dimension-six operator ${\cal O}^{αβ}_6 = \overline{\ell^{}_{α\rm L}} \widetilde{H} {\rm i} \not\!\partial \widetilde{H}^\dagger \ell^{}_{β\rm L}$ at the tree-level matching. The inclusion of only the Wilson coefficients $C^{αβ}_5$ and $C^{αβ}_6$ already enables the SEFT to incorporate all physical information about the full seesaw model. Moreover, the minimal sufficient and necessary conditions for CP conservation both in the SEFT and in the full theory are clarified, and the matching between the flavor invariants in both theories is accomplished. Through the matching of flavor invariants, the CP asymmetries necessary for successful leptogenesis are directly linked to those in neutrino-neutrino and neutrino-antineutrino oscillations at low energies. Surprisingly, it is revealed that the precise measurements of $C^{αβ}_5$ and $C^{αβ}_6$ in low-energy experiments are powerful enough to probe the full seesaw model, including CP violation for cosmological matter-antimatter asymmetry.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.