Paper detail

Speed, retention loss, and motional heating of atoms in an optical conveyor belt

The problem of high-speed transport for cold atoms with minimal heating has received considerable attention in theory and experiment. Much theoretical work has focused on solutions of general problems, often assuming a harmonic trapping potential or a 1D geometry. However in the case of optical conveyor belts these assumptions are not always valid. Here we present experimental and numerical studies of the effects of various motional parameters on heating and retention of atoms transported in an optical conveyor. Our numerical model is specialized to the geometry of a moving optical lattice and uses dephasing in the density matrix formalism to account for effects of motion in the transverse plane. We verify the model by a comparison with experimental measurements, and use it to gain further insight into the relationship between the conveyor's performance and the various parameters of the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.