Paper detail

Speed of sound in dense matter and two families of compact stars

The existence of massive compact stars $(M\gtrsim 2.1 M_{\odot})$ implies that the conformal limit of the speed of sound $c_s^2=1/3$ is violated if those stars have a crust of ordinary nuclear matter. Here we show that, if the most massive objects are strange quark stars, i.e. stars entirely composed of quarks, the conformal limit can be respected while observational limits on those objects are also satisfied. By using astrophysical data associated with those massive stars, derived from electromagnetic and gravitational wave signals, we show, within a Bayesian analysis framework and by adopting a constant speed of sound equation of state, that the posterior distribution of $c_s^2$ is peaked around 0.3, and the maximum mass of the most probable equation of state is $\sim 2.13 M_{\odot}$. We discuss which new data would require a violation of the conformal limit even when considering strange quark stars, in particular we analyze the possibility that the maximum mass of compact stars is larger than $2.5M_{\odot}$, as it would be if the secondary component of GW190814 is a compact star and not a black hole. Finally, we discuss how the new data for PSR J0740+6620 obtained by the NICER collaboration compare with our analysis (not based on them) and with other possible interpretations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.