Paper detail

Speed Limit of Efficient Cavity-Mediated Adiabatic Transfer

Cavity-mediated adiabatic transfer (CMAT) is a robust way to perform a two-qubit gate between trapped atoms inside an optical cavity. In the previous study by Goto and Ichimura [H. Goto and K. Ichimura, Phys. Rev. A 77, 013816 (2008).], the upper bound of success probability of CMAT was shown where the operation is adiabatically slow. For practical applications, however, it is crucial to operate CMAT as fast as possible without sacrificing the success probability. In this paper, we investigate the operational speed limit of CMAT conditioned on the success probability being close to the upper bound. In CMAT both the adiabatic condition and the decay of atoms and cavity modes limit the operational speed. We show which of these two conditions more severely limits the operational speed in each cavity-QED parameter region, and find that the maximal operational speed is achieved when the influence of cavity decay is dominant compared to spontaneous emission.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.