Paper detail

Speech Pseudonymisation Assessment Using Voice Similarity Matrices

The proliferation of speech technologies and rising privacy legislation calls for the development of privacy preservation solutions for speech applications. These are essential since speech signals convey a wealth of rich, personal and potentially sensitive information. Anonymisation, the focus of the recent VoicePrivacy initiative, is one strategy to protect speaker identity information. Pseudonymisation solutions aim not only to mask the speaker identity and preserve the linguistic content, quality and naturalness, as is the goal of anonymisation, but also to preserve voice distinctiveness. Existing metrics for the assessment of anonymisation are ill-suited and those for the assessment of pseudonymisation are completely lacking. Based upon voice similarity matrices, this paper proposes the first intuitive visualisation of pseudonymisation performance for speech signals and two novel metrics for objective assessment. They reflect the two, key pseudonymisation requirements of de-identification and voice distinctiveness.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.