Paper detail

Spectrum Sharing with Distributed Relay Selection and Clustering

We consider a spectrum-sharing network where n secondary relays are used to increase secondary rate and also mitigate interference on the primary by reducing the required overall secondary emitted power. We propose a distributed relay selection and clustering framework, obtain closed-form expressions for the secondary rate, and show that secondary rate increases proportionally to log n. Remarkably, this is on the same order as the growth rate obtained in the absence of a primary system and its imposed constraints. Our results show that to maximize the rate, the secondary relays must transmit with power proportional to n^(-1) (thus the sum of relay powers is bounded) and also that the secondary source may not operate at its maximum allowable power. The tradeoff between the secondary rate and the interference on the primary is also characterized, showing that the primary interference can be reduced asymptotically to zero as n increases, while still maintaining a secondary rate that grows proportionally to log n. Finally, to address the rate loss due to half-duplex relaying in the secondary, we propose an alternating relay protocol and investigate its performance.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.