Paper detail

Spectrum preserving short cycle removal on regular graphs

We describe a new method to remove short cycles on regular graphs while maintaining spectral bounds (the nontrivial eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix), as long as the graphs have certain combinatorial properties. These combinatorial properties are related to the number and distance between short cycles and are known to happen with high probability in uniformly random regular graphs. Using this method we can show two results involving high girth spectral expander graphs. First, we show that given $d \geq 3$ and $n$, there exists an explicit distribution of $d$-regular $Θ(n)$-vertex graphs where with high probability its samples have girth $Ω(\log_{d - 1} n)$ and are $ε$-near-Ramanujan; i.e., its eigenvalues are bounded in magnitude by $2\sqrt{d - 1} + ε$ (excluding the single trivial eigenvalue of $d$). Then, for every constant $d \geq 3$ and $ε> 0$, we give a deterministic poly$(n)$-time algorithm that outputs a $d$-regular graph on $Θ(n)$-vertices that is $ε$-near-Ramanujan and has girth $Ω(\sqrt{\log n})$, based on the work of arXiv:1909.06988 .

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.