Paper detail

Spectrum Access through Threats in Cognitive Radio Networks

We consider multiple access games in which primary users are interested in maximizing their confidential data rate at the minimum possible transmission power and secondary users employ eavesdropping as a leverage to maximize their data rate to a common destination at minimum transmission energy. For the non-cooperative static game, Nash equilibria in pure and mixed strategies are derived and shown to be Pareto inefficient in general, when channel gains are common knowledge. For the two-player Stackelberg game where the primary user is the leader, it is shown that the secondary user is forced to play as the follower where the Stackelberg equilibrium dominates the Nash equilibrium, even if the eavesdropper channel is better than the primary channel. Here, the utility achieved by the Stackelberg game Pareto-dominates the achieved Nash utility. Moreover, we study the unknown eavesdropper channel case numerically where the primary user has only statistical knowledge about the channel gain. We compare the results to the first scenario and show that it is not always beneficial for the cognitive user to hide the actual eavesdropper channel gain. Finally, we extend the equilibrium analysis to a multiple SU game where the primary system selects a subset of the secondary users to transmit such that the performance of the primary users is maximized.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.