Paper detail

Spectroscopy Unveils the Complex Nature of Terzan 5

We present the chemical abundance analysis of 33 red giant stars belonging to the complex stellar system Terzan 5. We confirm the discovery of two stellar populations (Ferraro et al. 2009, Nature, 462,483) with distinct iron abundances: a relatively metal-poor component with [Fe/H]=-0.25 +/- 0.07 r.m.s., and another component with [Fe/H]=+0.27 +/- 0.04 r.m.s., exceeding in metallicity any known Galactic globular cluster. The two populations also show different [alpha/Fe] abundance ratios. The metal-poor component has an average [alpha/Fe]=+0.34 +/- 0.06 r.m.s., consistent with the canonical scenario for rapid enrichment by core collapse supernovae (SNe). The metal-rich component has [alpha/Fe]=+0.03 +/-i 0.04 r.m.s., suggesting that the gas from which it formed was polluted by both type II and type Ia SNe on a longer timescale. Neither of the two populations shows evidence of the [Al/Fe] over [O/Fe] anti-correlation, that is typically observed in Galactic globular clusters. Because these chemical abundance patterns are unique, we propose that Terzan 5 is not a true globular cluster, but a stellar system with a much more complex history of star formation and chemical enrichment.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.