Paper detail

Spectroscopy of z~6 i-dropout Galaxies: Frequency of Ly-alpha Emission and the Sizes of Ly-alpha Emitting Galaxies

We report on deep spectroscopy using LRIS on Keck I and FORS2 on the VLT of a sample of 22 candidate z~6 Lyman Break galaxies (LBGs) selected by the i-z> 1.3 dropout criterion. Redshifts could be measured for eight objects. These redshifts are all in the range z = 5.5 - 6.1, confirming the efficiency of the i-z color selection technique. Six of the confirmed galaxies show Ly-alpha emission. Assuming that the 14 objects without redshifts are z~6 LBGs, but lack detectable Ly-alpha emission lines, we infer that the fraction of Ly-alpha emitting LBGs with Ly-alpha equivalent widths greater than 20 Angstroms among z~6 LBGs is ~30%, similar to that found at z~3. Every Ly-alpha emitting object in our sample is compact with r <= 0.14". Furthermore, all the Ly-alpha emitting objects in our sample are more compact than average relative to the observed size-magnitude relation of a large i-dropout sample (332 candidate z~6 objects). We can reject the hypothesis that the Ly-alpha emitting population is a subset of the rest of the z~6 LBG population at >97% confidence. We speculate the small sizes of Ly-alpha emitting LBGs are due to these objects being less massive than other LBGs at z~6.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.