Paper detail

Spectroscopy of New Substellar Candidates in the Pleiades: Towards a Spectral Sequence for Young Brown Dwarfs

We present optical and near-IR spectroscopy (600--1000 nm) of 8 faint (I$>$18) very red (R--I$>$2.2) objects discovered in a deep CCD survey of the Pleiades (Zapatero-Osorio et al. 1996). We compare them with reliable cluster members like PPl 15 and Teide 1, and with several field very late-type dwarfs (M4--M9.5), which were observed with similar instrumental configurations. Using pseudocontinuum ratios we classify the new substellar candidates in a spectal sequence defined with reference to field stars of known spectral types. We also reclassify PPl 15 and Teide 1 in a self-consistent way. The likelihood of membership for the new candidates is assesed via the study of their photospheric features, Ha emission, radial velocity, and consistency of their spectral types and I magnitudes with known cluster members. Four of the new substellar candidates are as late or later than PPl~15 (M6.5), but only one, Calar 3 (M8), clearly meets all our membership criteria. It is indeed an object very similar to the brown dwarf Teide 1. Calar 3, together with Teide 1, allows one to compare the spectroscopic characteristics of Pleiades brown dwarfs with those of old very cool dwarfs. The overall spectral properties are similar, but there are slight differences in the NaI doublet (818.3 nm, 819.5 nm), VO molecular band (740 nm), and some spectral ratios, which are probably related to lower surface gravity in the young Pleiades brown dwarfs than in field stars. Finally, we propose a way of improving future CCD-based brown dwarf surveys by using narrow-band near-IR pseudocontinuum filters.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.