Paper detail

Spectroscopically Identified Intermediate Age Stars at 0.5 - 3 pc Distance from Sgr A*

<Context.> Nuclear star clusters (NSCs) at the dynamical center of galaxies appear to have a complex star formation history. This suggests repeated star formation even in the influence of the strong tidal field from supermassive black holes. <Aim.> In our previous study, we have detected 31 so far unknown early-type star candidates throughout the Galactic NSC (at 0.5 - 3 pc from Sgr A*; Nishiyama and Schoedel 2013). The aim of this study is a confirmation of the spectral type for the candidates. <Method.> We have carried out NIR spectroscopic observations of the candidates using Subaru/IRCS/AO188/LGS. K-band spectra for 20 out of the 31 candidates were obtained. By determining an equivalent width, EW(CO), of the 12CO absorption feature at 2.294 um, we have derived an effective temperature and a bolometric magnitude for each candidate, and then constructed an HR diagram. <Results.> No young (~ Myr), massive stars are included in the 20 candidates we observed; however, 13 candidates are most likely intermediate-age giants (50 - 500 Myr). Two other sources have ages of ~1 Gyr, and the remaining five sources are old (> 1 Gyr), late-type giants. <Conclusions.> Although none of the early-type star candidates from our previous narrow-band imaging observations can be confirmed as a young star, we find that the photometric technique is sensitive to distinguish old, late-type giants from young and intermediate-age populations. The intermediate-age stars could be so far unknown members of a population formed in a starburst ~100 Myr ago. Finding no young (~ a few Myr) stars at R = 0.5 - 3 pc favors the in-situ formation scenario for the presence of the young stars at R < 0.5 pc. Furthermore, the different spatial distributions of the young and the intermediate-age stars imply that the Galactic NSC is an aggregate of stars born in different places and under different physical conditions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.