Paper detail

Spectroscopically Confirmed Lyman-Alpha Emitters from Redshift 5 to 7 Behind Ten Galaxy Cluster Lenses

We present 36 spectroscopically confirmed intrinsically UV-faint Ly$α$ emitting galaxies from follow-up observations with Keck/DEIMOS of gravitationally lensed high-redshift candidates. Candidates were selected to be between $5\lesssim z \lesssim 7$ from photometric data using \textit{HST} and \textit{Spitzer} imaging surveys. We used photometric redshift information to perform an integrated photometric redshift probability cut $>1\%$ between $5<z<7$ to construct a sample of 198 high-redshift objects. Our high-redshift sample spans intrinsic UV luminosities from a few $L^*$ down to $0.001L^*$. We identified 19 high-confidence detections of Ly$α$ and an additional 17 likely detections. We divided our sample into lower-redshift ($z\sim5.5$) and higher-redshift ($z\sim6.5$) bins and ran Monte Carlo trials, incorporating the strength of the Ly$α$ emission and the photometric redshift of the non-detections. Considering only objects where Ly$α$ could be detected at EW(Ly$α$)$>$25Å at $3σ$ at the fiducial depth of our survey, and only those galaxies with EW(Ly$α$)$>$25Å as true LAEs, and finally, only objects with $m_{AB}<26.8$, we found the LAE fraction to be flat, or modestly increase from 0.26$\pm0.04$ to 0.30$\pm0.04$. These values relative to those for lower-redshift samples are consistent with a rising LAE fraction with redshift out to $z\sim6$, but at $z\sim6.5$ there is some tension between our results and results from surveys at intrinsically brighter luminosities. We conclude intrinsically fainter galaxies have Ly$α$ emission, and there is a steep drop in the LAE fraction from our high-redshift sample at $z\sim6.5$ and from similar galaxies at $z\sim7.5$. This likely indicates we are witnessing the tail end of the epoch of reionization, as such a drop is not expected due to changes of intrinsic galaxy properties between these redshifts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.