Paper detail

Spectroscopic Study of Globular Clusters in the Halo of M31 with Xinglong 2.16m Telescope

We present the spectroscopic observations for 11 confirmed globular clusters of M31 with the OMR spectrograph on 2.16m telescope at Xinglong site of National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Nine of our sample clusters are located in the halo of M31 and the most remote one is out to a projected radius of 78.75 kpc from the galactic center. For all our sample clusters, we measured the Lick absorption-line indices and the radial velocities. It is noted that most GCs of our sample are distinct from the HI rotation curve of M31 galaxy, especially for B514, MCGC5, H12 and B517, suggesting that most of our sample clusters do not have kinematic association with the star forming young disk of the galaxy. We fitted the absorption line indices with the updated stellar population model Thomas et al. (2010) with two different tracks of Cassisi and Padova, separately, by applying the $χ^2-$minimization method. The fitting results show that all our sample clusters are older than 10 Gyr, and metal-poor ($-0.91 \le $ [Fe/H] $\le -2.38$ dex). After merging the spectroscopic metallicity of our work with the previously published ones, we extended the cluster sample out to a projected radius of 117 kpc from the galaxy's center. We found the metallicity gradient for all the confirmed clusters exists with a slope of $-0.028\pm0.001$ dex kpc$^{-1}$. However, the slope turns to be $-0.018\pm0.001$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ for all the halo clusters, which is much shallower. If we only consider the outer halo clusters with $r_{\rm p}>25$ kpc, the slope becomes $-0.010\pm0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$ and if one cluster G001 is excluded from the outer halo sample, the slope is $-0.004\pm0.002$ dex kpc$^{-1}$. Thus we conclude that metallicity gradient for M31 outer halo clusters is not significant, which agrees well with the previous findings.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.