Paper detail

Spectroscopic study of Ceres' collisional family candidates

Context: Despite the observed signs of large impacts on the surface of Ceres, there is no confirmed collisional family associated with this dwarf planet. After a dynamical and photometric study, a sample of 156 asteroids was proposed as candidate members of a Ceres collisional family. Aims: Our main objective is to study the connection between Ceres and a total of 14 observed asteroids among the candidate's sample to explore their genetic relationships with Ceres. Methods: We obtained visible spectra of these 14 asteroids using the OSIRIS spectrograph at the 10.4 m Gran Telescopio Canarias(GTC). We computed spectral slopes in two different wavelength ranges, from 0.49 to 0.80μm and from 0.80 to 0.92μm, to compare the values obtained with those on Ceres' surface previously computed using the Visible and Infrared Spectrometer (VIR) instrument onboard the NASA Dawn spacecraft. We also calculated the spectral slopes in the same range for ground-based observations of Cerescollected from the literature. Results: We present the visible spectra and the taxonomy of 14 observed asteroids. We found that only two of the asteroids are spectrally compatible with Ceres' surface. Further analysis of those two asteroids indicates that they are spectrally young and thus less likely to be members of the Ceres family. Conclusions: All in all, our results indicate that most of the 14 observed asteroids are not likely to belong to a Ceres collisional family. Despite two of them being spectrally compatible with the young surface of Ceres, further evaluation is needed to confirm or reject their origin from Ceres.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.