Paper detail

Spectroscopic QUasar Extractor and redshift (z) EstimatorSQUEzE II: Universality of the results

In this paper we study the universality of the results of SQUEzE, a software package to classify quasar spectra and estimate their redshifts. The code is presented in \cite{Perez-Rafols+2019}. We test the results against changes on signal-to-noise, spectral resolution, wavelength coverage, and quasar brightness. We find that SQUEzE levels of performance (quantified with purity and completeness) are stable to spectra that have a noise dispersion 4 times that of our standard test sample, BOSS. We also find that the performance remains unchanged if pixels of width 25Åare considered, and decreases by $\sim2\%$ for pixels of width 100Å. We see no effect when analyzing subsets of different quasar brightness, and we establish that the blue part (up to 7000Å) of the spectra is sufficient for the classification. Finally, we compare our suite of tests with samples of spectra expected from WEAVE-QSO and DESI, and narrow-band imaging from J-PAS. We conclude that SQUEzE will perform similarly when confronted with the demands of these future surveys as when applied to current BOSS (and eBOSS) data. {\it Keywords: cosmology: observations - quasar: emission lines - quasar: absorption lines}

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.