Paper detail

Spectroscopic observation of Ly$α$ emitters at z~7.7 and implications on re-ionization

We present spectroscopic follow-up observations on two bright Ly$α$ emitter (LAE) candidates originally found by Krug et al. (2012) at a redshift of z~7.7 using the Multi-Object Spectrometer for Infra-Red Exploration (MOSFIRE) at Keck. We rule out any line emission at the >5$σ$ level for both objects, putting on solid ground a previous null result for one of the objects. The limits inferred from the non-detections rule out the previous claim of no or even reversed evolution between 5.7 < z < 7.7 in the Ly$α$ luminosity function (LF) and suggest a drop in the Ly$α$ luminosity function consistent with that seen in Lyman Break galaxy (LBG) samples. We model the redshift evolution of the LAE LF using the LBG UV continuum LF and the observed rest-frame equivalent width distribution. From the comparison of our empirical model with the observed LAE distribution, we estimate lower limits of the neutral hydrogen fraction to be 50-70% at z~7.7. Together with this, we find a strong evolution in the Ly$α$ optical depth characterized by (1+z)^(2.2 $\pm$ 0.5) beyond z=6 indicative of a strong evolution of the IGM. Finally, we extrapolate the LAE LF to z~9 using our model and show that it is unlikely that large area surveys like UltraVISTA or Euclid pick up LAEs at this redshift assuming the current depths and area.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.