Paper detail

Spectroscopic evidence for two-gap superconductivity in the quasi-one dimensional chalcogenide Nb$_{2}$Pd$_{0.81}$S$_{5}$

We present the first direct evidence for two-band superconductivity in the quasi-one dimensional chalcogenide Nb$_{2}$Pd$_{0.81}$S$_{5}$. Soft point contact spectroscopic measurements reveal Andreev reflection in the differential conductance $G$ in the zero-resistance superconducting (SC) state below $T_c$(=6.6~K). Multiple peaks in $G$ were clearly observed at 1.8~K and were successfully explained by the two-band Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk model with two gaps $Δ_{1}=0.48$~meV and $Δ_{2}=1.05$~meV. Their evolution in temperature and magnetic field is consistent with the conventional BCS theory. The SC gap to $T_c$ ratio for $Δ_1$ and $Δ_2$ is 1.7 and 3.7, which is similar to the weak coupling BCS prediction of 3.5. These results demonstrate that the newly discovered niobium chalcogenide is a two-gap superconductor in the weak coupling limit.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.