Paper detail

Spectroscopic evidence for helicity in explosive events

We report spectroscopic observations in support of a novel view of transition region explosive events, observations that lend empirical evidence that at least in some cases explosive events may be nothing else than spinning narrow spicule-like structures. Our spectra of textbook explosive events with simultaneous Doppler flow of a red and of a blue component are extreme cases of high spectro-scopic velocities that lack apparent motion, to be expected if interpreted as a pair of collimated, linearly moving jets. The awareness of this conflict led us to the alternate interpretation of redshift and blueshift as spinning motion of a small plasma volume. In contrast to the bidirectional jet scenario, a small volume of spinning plasma would be fully compatible with the observation of flows without detectable apparent motion. We suspect that these small volumes could be spicule-like structures and try to find evidence. We show observations of helical motion in macrospicules and argue that these features - if scaled down to a radius comparable to the slit size of a spectrometer - should have a spectroscopic signature similar to that observed in explosive events, while not easily detectable by imagers. Despite of this difficulty, evidence of helicity in spicules has been reported in the literature. This inspired us to the new insight that the same narrow spinning structures may be the drivers in both cases, structures that imagers observe as spicules and that in spectrometers cross the slit and are seen as explosive events. We arrive at a concept that supports the idea that explosive events and spicules are different manifestations of the same helicity driven scenario. Consequently, in such a case, a photospheric or subphotosperic trigger has to be assumed.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.