Paper detail

Spectroscopic Confirmation of Redshifts Predicted by Gravitational Lensing

We present deep spectroscopic measurements of 18 distant field galaxies identified as gravitationally-lensed arcs in a Hubble Space Telescope image of the cluster Abell 2218. Redshifts of these objects were predicted by Kneib et al. (1996) using a lensing analysis constrained by the properties of two bright arcs of known redshift and other multiply-imaged sources. The new spectroscopic identifications were obtained using long exposures with the LDSS-2 spectrograph on the William Herschel Telescope and demonstrate the capability of that instrument to new limits, $R\simeq$24; the lensing magnification implies true source magnitudes as faint as $R\simeq$25. Statistically, our measured redshifts are in excellent agreement with those predicted from Kneib et al.'s lensing analysis which gives considerable support to the redshift distribution derived by the lensing inversion method for the more numerous and fainter arclets extending to $R\simeq 25.5$. We explore the remaining uncertainties arising from both the mass distribution in the central regions of Abell 2218 and the inversion method itself, and conclude that the mean redshift of the faint field population at $R\simeq$25.5 ($B\sim 26$-27) is low, $<z>$=0.8-1. We discuss this result in the context of redshift distributions estimated from multi-colour photometry. Although such comparisons are not straightforward, we suggest that photometric techniques may achieve a reasonable level of agreement particularly when they include near-infrared photometry with discriminatory capabilities in the $1<z<$2 range.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.