Paper detail

Spectroscopic Binaries in Planetary Nebulae

It is already known that about 10% of central stars of PNe are very short-period binaries (hours to days), which are detected through photometric variations. These must have been formed through common-envelope interactions in initially wide binaries, accompanied by ejection of the envelope and its subsequent photoionization as a PN. Radial-velocity observations by ourselves and others are now suggesting that an even larger fraction of planetary nuclei may be spectroscopic binaries, making the total binary fraction very large. However, we have not as yet been able to rule out the possibility that the apparent velocity changes are actually due to stellar-wind variations. Pending follow-up spectroscopic observations with large telescopes, it presently appears plausible that binary-star ejection is the major formation channel for planetary nebulae.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.