Paper detail

Spectropolarimetric properties of Swift J1818.0$-$1607: a 1.4 s radio magnetar

The soft-gamma repeater Swift J1818.0$-$1607 is only the fifth magnetar found to exhibit pulsed radio emission. Using the Ultra-Wideband Low receiver system of the Parkes radio telescope, we conducted a 3 h observation of Swift J1818.0$-$1607. Folding the data at a rotation period of $P = 1.363$ s, we obtained wideband polarization profiles and flux density measurements covering radio frequencies between 704-4032 MHz. After measuring, and then correcting for the pulsar's rotation measure of $1442.0 \pm 0.2$ rad m$^{-2}$, we find the radio profile is between 80-100 per cent linearly polarized across the wide observing band, with a small amount of depolarization at low frequencies that we ascribe to scatter broadening. We also measure a steep spectral index of $α= -2.26^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ across our large frequency range, a significant deviation from the flat or inverted spectra often associated with radio-loud magnetars. The steep spectrum and temporal rise in flux density bears some resemblance to the behaviour of the magnetar-like, rotation-powered pulsar PSR J1119$-$6127. This leads us to speculate that Swift J1818.0$-$1607 may represent an additional link between rotation-powered pulsars and magnetars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.