Paper detail

Spectrophotometric properties of galaxies at intermediate redshifts (z ~ 0.2--1.0) II. The Luminosity -- Metallicity relation

We present the gas-phase oxygen abundance (O/H) for a sample of 131 star-forming galaxies at intermediate redshifts ($0.2<z<1.0$). The sample selection, the spectroscopic observations (mainly with VLT/FORS) and associated data reduction, the photometric properties, the emission-line measurements, and the spectral classification are fully described in a companion paper (Paper I). We use two methods to estimate the O/H abundance ratio: the {} "standard" $R\_{\mathrm{23}}$ method which is based on empirical calibrations, and the CL01 method which is based on grids of photo-ionization models and on the fitting of emission lines. For most galaxies, we have been able to solve the problem of the metallicity degeneracy between the high- and low-metallicity branches of the O/H vs. $R\_{\mathrm{23}}$ relationship using various secondary indicators. The luminosity -- metallicity ($L-Z$) relation has been derived in the $B$- and $R$-bands, with metallicities derived with the two methods ($R\_{\mathrm{23}}$ and CL01). In the analysis, we first consider our sample alone and then a larger one which includes other samples of intermediate-redshift galaxies drawn from the literature. The derived $L-Z$ relations at intermediate redshifts are very similar (same slope) to the $L-Z$ relation obtained for the local universe. Our sample alone only shows a small evolution of the $L-Z$ relation with redshift up to $z\sim1.0$. We only find statistical variations consistent with the uncertainty in the derived parameters. Including other samples of intermediate-redshift galaxies, we find however that galaxies at $z\sim1$ appear to be metal-deficient by a factor of $\sim3$ compared with galaxies in the local universe. For a given luminosity, they contain on average about one third of the metals locked in local galaxies.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.