Paper detail

Spectrometry of the Urban Lightscape

NASA's Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth Contains over 30000 photos of 2500 cataloged urban lightscapes (urban night lights) taken from the International Space Station. Over 100 of these multispectral DSLR photos are of sufficient spatial resolution, sharpness and exposure to be used for broadband spectral characterization of urban lightscapes. Analysis of simulated atmospheric transmissivity from the MODTRAN radiative transfer model shows that spectral slopes of transmissivity spectra are relatively insensitive to choice of model atmopshere, with variations in atmospheric path length and aerosol optical depth primarily affecting the bias of the spectrum rather than the slope. This suggests that color tempterature-calibrated RGB channels can be corrected for relative differences in atmospheric scattering and absorption to allow for quantitative intercomparison. A mosaic of 18 intercalibrated RGB photos renders a spectral feature space with four clearly defined spectral endmembers corresponding to white, yellow and red light sources, with brightness modulated by a dark background endmember. These four spectral endmembers form the basis of a linear spectral mixture model which can be inverted to provide estimates of the areal fraction of each endmember present within every pixel instantaneous field of view. The resulting spectral feature space shows two distinct mixing trends extending from the dark endmember to near flat spectrum (white-yellow) and warm spectrum (orange) sources. The distribution of illuminated pixels is strongly skewed toward a lower luminance background of warm spectrum street lighting, with brighter lights generally corresponding to point sources and major thoroughfares. Intercomparison of 18 individual urban lightscape spectral feature spaces show consistent topology, despite variations in exposure and interior mixing trends.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.