Paper detail

Spectrally degenerate graphs: Hereditary case

It is well known that the spectral radius of a tree whose maximum degree is D cannot exceed 2sqrt{D-1}. Similar upper bound holds for arbitrary planar graphs, whose spectral radius cannot exceed sqrt{8D}+10, and more generally, for all d-degenerate graphs, where the corresponding upper bound is sqrt{4dD}. Following this, we say that a graph G is spectrally d-degenerate if every subgraph H of G has spectral radius at most sqrt{d.Delta(H)}. In this paper we derive a rough converse of the above-mentioned results by proving that each spectrally d-degenerate graph G contains a vertex whose degree is at most 4dlog_2(D/d) (if D>=2d). It is shown that the dependence on D in this upper bound cannot be eliminated, as long as the dependence on d is subexponential. It is also proved that the problem of deciding if a graph is spectrally d-degenerate is co-NP-complete.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.