Paper detail

Spectral variation across Pulsar Profile due to Coherent Curvature Radiation

The pulsar profile is characterised by two distinct emission components, the core and the cone. The standard model of a pulsar radio emission beam originating from dipolar magnetic fields, places the core at the centre surrounded by concentric layers of inner and outer conal components. The core emission is expected to have steeper spectra compared to the cones. We present a detailed analysis of the relative differences in spectra between the core and conal emission from a large sample of 53 pulsars over a wide frequency range between 100 MHz and 10 GHz. The core was seen to be much steeper than the cones particularly between 100 MHz and 1 GHz with a relative difference between the spectral index $Δα_{core/cone}\sim$ -1.0. In addition we also found the spectra of the outer conal components to be steeper than the inner cone with relative difference in the spectral index $Δα_{in/out}\sim$ +0.5. The flattening of the spectra from the magnetic axis towards the edge of the open field line region with increasing curvature of the field lines is a natural outcome of the coherent curvature radiation from charged soliton bunches, and explains the difference in spectra between the core and the cones. In addition due to the relativistic beaming effect, the radiation is only visible when it is directed towards the observer over a narrow angle $θ\leq 1/γ$, where $γ$ is the Lorentz factor of the outflowing plasma clouds. This restricts the emission particularly from outer cones, that are associated with field lines with larger curvature thereby making the spectra steeper than the inner cones.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.