Paper detail

Spectral variability of IRAS 18325-5926 and constraints on the geometry of the scattering medium

We analyze Suzaku and XMM-Newton data of the highly variable Seyfert 2, IRAS 18325-5926. The spectra of the source are well modeled as a primary component described as an absorbed power law and a secondary power law component which is consistent with being scattered emission from an on-axis extended highly ionized medium. We show that while the primary component varies on a wide range of timescales from $10^{4} - 10^{8}$ s, the scattered emission is variable only on timescales longer than $10^{5}$ s. This implies that the extent of the scattering medium is greater than $10^{16}$ cm. The ratio of the scattered to primary flux ($\sim 0.03$) implies a column density for the scattering medium to be $\sim 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$. We argue that for such a medium to be highly ionized it must be located less than $10^{17}$ cm from the X-ray source. Thus we localize the position and extent of scattering region to be $\sim$ a few $\times 10^{16}$ cm, with an average particle density of $\sim 10^{6}$ cm$^{-3}$. We consider the physical interpretation of these results and as an aside, we confirm the presence of a broad Iron line emission in both the {\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Suzaku} observations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.