Paper detail

Spectral radius and (globally) rigidity of graphs in $R^2$

Over the past half century, the rigidity of graphs in $R^2$ has aroused a great deal of interest. Lovász and Yemini (1982) proved that every $6$-connected graph is rigid in $R^2$. Jackson and Jordán (2005) provided a similar vertex-connectivity condition for the globally rigidity of graphs in $R^2$. These results imply that a graph $G$ with algebraic connectivity $μ(G)>5$ is (globally) rigid in $R^2$. Cioabă, Dewar and Gu (2021) improved this bound, and proved that a graph $G$ with minimum degree $δ\geq 6$ is rigid in $R^2$ if $μ(G)>2+\frac{1}{δ-1}$, and is globally rigid in $R^2$ if $μ(G)>2+\frac{2}{δ-1}$. In this paper, we study the (globally) rigidity of graphs in $R^2$ from the viewpoint of adjacency eigenvalues. Specifically, we provide sufficient conditions for a 2-connected (resp. 3-connected) graph with given minimum degree to be rigid (resp. globally rigid) in terms of the spectral radius. Furthermore, we determine the unique graph attaining the maximum spectral radius among all minimally rigid graphs of order $n$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.