Paper detail

Spectral Properties and the Effect on Redshift Cut-off of Compact AGNs from the AT20G Survey

We use high angular resolution data, measured from visibility of sources at the longest baseline of 4500 m of the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA), for the Australia Telescope 20 GHz (AT20G) survey to obtain angular size information for > 94% of AT20G sources. We confirm the previous AT20G result that due to the high survey frequency of 20 GHz, the source population is strongly dominated by compact sources (79%). At 0.15 arcseconds angular resolution limit, we show a very strong correlation between the compact and extended sources with flat and steep-spectrum sources respectively. Thus, we provide a firm physical basis for the traditional spectral classification into flat and steep-spectrum sources to separate compact and extended sources. We find the cut-off of -0.46 to be optimum for spectral indices between 1 and 5 GHz and, hence, recommend the continued use of -0.5 for future studies. We study the effect of spectral curvature on redshift cut-off of compact AGNs using recently published redshift data. Using spectral indices at different frequencies, we correct for the redshift effect and produce restframe frequency spectra for compact sources for redshift up to ~5. We show that the flat spectra of most compact sources start to steepen at ~30 GHz. At higher frequencies, the spectra of both populations are steep so the use of spectral index does not separate the compact and extended source populations as well as in lower frequencies. We find that due to the spectral steepening, surveys of compact sources at higher frequencies (>5 GHz) will have redshift cut-off due to spectral curvature but at lower frequencies, the surveys are not significantly affected by spectral curvature, thus, the evidence for a strong redshift cut-off in AGNs found in lower frequency surveys is a real cut-off and not a result of K-correction.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.