Paper detail

Spectral POD analysis of the turbulent wake of a disk at Re = 50, 000

The coherent structures in the turbulent wake of a disk at a moderately high Reynolds number ($\Rey$) of $50,000$ are examined using spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) which considers all three velocity components in a numerical database. The SPOD eigenvalues at a given streamwise ($x$) location are functions of azimuthal wavenumber ($m$), frequency ($\Str$), and SPOD index ($n$). By $x/D =10$, two specific modes dominate the fluctuation energy: (i) the vortex shedding (VS) mode with $m=1, \Str =0.135, n=1$, and (ii) the double helix (DH) mode with $m=2, \Str \rightarrow 0, n=1$. The VS mode is more energetic than the DH mode in the near wake but, in the far wake, it is the DH mode which is dominant. The DH mode, when scaled with local turbulent velocity and length scales, shows self-similarity in eigenvalues and eigenmodes while the VS mode, which is a global mode, does not exhibit strict self-similarity. Modes $m = 0$, 3 and 4, although subdominant, also make a significant net contribution to the fluctuation energy, and their eigenspectra are evaluated. The reconstruction of TKE and Reynolds shear stress, $\langle u'_{x} u'_{r} \rangle$, is evaluated by varying $(m,\Str,n)$ combinations. Higher SPOD modes contribute significantly to the TKE, especially near the centerline. In contrast, reconstruction of $\langle u'_{x}u'_{r}\rangle $ requires far fewer modes: $|m| \leq 4 $, $|\Str| \leq 1$ and $n \leq 3$. Among azimuthal modes, $m=1$ and $2$ are the leading contributors to both TKE and $\langle u'_{x}u'_{r} \rangle $. While $m=1$ captures the slope of the shear-stress profile near the centerline, $m=2$ is important to capture $\langle u'_{x}u'_{r} \rangle $ at and near its peak. SPOD is also performed in the vicinity of the disk to describe the modal transition to the principal contributors in the wake.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.