Paper detail

Spectral Norm, Economical Sieve, and Linear Invariance Testing of Boolean Functions

Given Boolean functions \( f, g : \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \{-1,+1\} \), we say they are {\em linearly isomorphic} if there exists \( A \in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_2) \) such that \( f(x)=g(Ax) \) for all \( x \). We study this problem in the tolerant property testing framework under the known--unknown model, where \( g \) is given explicitly and \( f \) is accessible only via oracle queries, meaning the algorithm may adaptively request the value of \( f(x) \) for inputs \( x \in \mathbb{F}_2^n \) of its choice. Given parameters \( ε\ge 0 \) and \( ω>0 \), the goal is to distinguish whether there exists \( A \in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_{2})\) such that the normalized Hamming distance between \( f \) and \( g(Ax) \) is at most \( ε\), or whether for every \( A \in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F}_2) \) the distance is at least \( ε+ω\). Our main result is a tolerant tester making \( \widetilde{O} \left( \left( m/ω\right)^4 \right) \) queries to \( f \), where \( m \) is an upper bound on the spectral norm of \( g \), improving the previous \( \widetilde{O} \left( \left( m/ω\right)^{24} \right) \) bound of Wimmer and Yoshida. We complement this with a nearly matching lower bound of \( Ω(m^2) \) for constant \( ω\) (for example, \( ω=1/4 \)), improving the prior \( Ω(\log m) \) lower bound of Grigorescu, Wimmer and Xie. A key technical ingredient on the algorithmic side is a query-efficient local list corrector. For the lower bound, we give a reduction from communication complexity using a novel subclass of Maiorana--McFarland functions from symmetric-key cryptography.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.